“The transparency the contest provides in the feedback and scoring is by far its greatest strength, as well as its greatest challenge.” (Click above to read more.)
I think the discrepancies help demonstrate you’ve really made people think about your voice as a writer more than your technical craft, and that’s an important factor to me, and I hope, many other readers.
I look at judging as a coaching job. If I like the concept and the direction the story is going, but the writing is too loose, I try to encourage that writer to stay with it and work on the execution. (Click above to read more.)
What has been most helpful to me is thinking about judging in the same way that I do grading English literature essays. (Click above to read more.)
One of the things that I love most about publishing and one of the things that frustrates me is that there is no magic formula for creating a best-selling book. What will have one person riveted will have another putting the book down after chapter one and never picking it up again. This is one…
If judging books was a completely objective process, you could probably get computers to do it. (Click above to read more.)
Evaluating a manuscript is not an exact science. Although judges strive for total objectivity, no work of art will have the same effect on every person. The scoresheet breaks down all the many areas of novel-writing technique so that you can see your strengths and weaknesses, but you can't please everyone. One person may love the…
Doesn’t it drive you absolutely insane when somebody ruins something for you? Like when you watch a movie and you think it’s awesome—until someone points out that one flaw. “The music was so annoying!” “That one line was so cheesy.” “Elsa hair literally goes through her arm when she brushes it over her shoulder.” My…
